+My Angle
January 4, 2002

Dear Artist,

"So what's your angle?" a subscriber asks. I try to think what he means. Yesterday I protested in my return letter that I don't have an angle. I'm just a guy who likes to paint. I guess I'm also guilty of trying to empower others. Then again I think it's a matter of considering how others might empower themselves. I've decided that "what's your angle?" is a valuable question.

My angle is that generalized lives aren't too effective. All-encompassing woo-woo fancies and feel-good panaceas are old hat. Collectivization is dangerous but brotherhood and sisterhood aren't. In addition, academia is suspect and criticism has wandered off to another planet.

My angle is that by following an intensely personalized process you are led to growth, self-esteem, success and a degree of happiness. My angle doesn't offer to fix everything, but it has the beauty of practicality. It works. My angle is to train yourself to be absorbed in a specialty whether it be bookkeeping, bee-keeping, good-housekeeping, philately, marathoning, inventing the light-bulb or painting watercolors. It has to be something with enough complexity to hold an inquiring mind. My angle is to do the spadework for the growth of passion.

I've found that the greatest joys come from the confluence of brain, heart and hand. I've found that the way to self-realization and the serving of society is to just get your nose into a subject. It's all in the details. I've found that work itself is currency and while the world is full of wonder and love and surprise, the greatest world of all is the world of human imagination. That's my angle.

Best regards,

Robert

PS: "Positive thinking alone does not work." (Robert Kiyosaki, Rich Dad, Poor Dad)

Esoterica: There's another popular book going the rounds these days: The Cultural Creatives by Paul Ray and Sherry Anderson. It describes a supposed phenomenon whereby a growing number of sensible and sensitive people are currently affecting our world in a positive way. Many artists will fit the profiles that the authors describe.

The following are selected responses to the above and other letters. Thank you for writing rgenn@saraphina.com

+Rehearsing life
I think a lot of art has become diluted because the spadework isn't there and/or the brain is allowed to dominate the heart and the hand (to use a couple of your metaphors). I think it's important that when practitioners of art are able to speak eloquently about their work processes, that they do so - as you do in this letter. It's really important, I feel, to describe art in terms of rehearsal as well as in terms of inspiration. Not rehearsal in the sense of too much pre-planning of an artwork, but rehearsal in the sense of preparing oneself through life, through drawing and through experimentation, where the artist takes his or her eye "off the ball" for a while and is prepared to be caught unawares by an emergent visual fact and yet ultimately capitalize on that fact as a newly discovered personal gem idea. With this in mind, I love reading the interviews that David Sylvester did with Francis Bacon and those collected interviews of Matisse in the book by J. Flam (Matisse on Art). I really felt inspired by today's letter and found much to agree with. When one's confidence in one's artwork is built through practice - who can argue that away with words? Personally, I'm not immune to verbal criticism of my artwork, but I feel that my practice has already built something slightly more bullet-proof than any literal argument.

Peter Jones, Manchester, UK peter@artists.u-net.com

+Not a hobby
Thanks for your angle. A friend lately commented that my art-recreate old masters technique, is a hobby. Very irritating!!! Not only do I put my all into it, I think they are good. Your article said it all. Why do people consider producing beauty a hobby? There has to be a short reply that will stop them from this shallow mind set.

Mary Dresser mdresser6@hotmail.com

+Labor of love
The question you answered this past week, "So what's your angle" crops up from time to time with the Artist's Website Directory my brother and I started a few years ago. Unfortunately our world is full of skeptics and scammers that rob the positive energy of many people with an idea or dream they are willing to act upon. The Internet is a great communication resource, but as animals around a watering hole, it will also attract the predator. This creates an uneasy defensive mechanism in us, unfortunately many miss out on something they would enjoy. I sometimes wonder why I spend 20 or so hours a week working on the website. In building the web site, my brother and I now have something in common, plus I have met a number of great people through the internet I wouldn't have otherwise known. My brother the same, plus he has developed his data base and web site skills to a point where our site can offer art related services specifically tailored for visual artists and their interests. These skills keep him current in a rapidly changing industry.

Paul Constable, p.constable@sk.sympatico.ca

(RG note) Paul's directory for artists is at www.artistsincanada.com

+Ignored my heart
I'm an electrical engineer by profession and an artist at heart. My fantasy is to some day become an artist by profession, or at least an artist without a profession. When I was young trying to decide what to do with my life, I chose a path that I thought would provide a reliable income. I ignored my heart. It has taken me almost 30 years to realize this. I'm in the process of getting back on the path of my heart, and your emails provide me with insights and encouragement.

Ed Donnely, Pittsburgh, PA, USA edd@lifecor.com

+Just don't get it
People have asked me the same question from time to time. "Perpendicular to the circumference of a smile." has been my answer on more than one occasion. I just feel that sometimes people just "don't get it", and feel that everyone has some "angle to wangle" especially when it comes to the business of art. In all seriousness my "angle" has always been to do as much as I can for myself and others, without drawing lines between the good and the bad. It is hard sometimes not to step on the cracks, especially when the sidewalk is crumbled with age, but we just do what we can do and move on down the road.

Deborah Russell, Lutherville, Maryland, USA sellwein@hotmail.com

+Block out the negative
I think it is fair to say that you get out of something what you put into it, so it's actually logical, and for an artist surely a necessity, to invest as much of yourself as possible into what they are doing. The quality an artist has to have most of is the belief that all things are possible (even if some miracles take a little longer). The person looking for your "angle" has simply missed the point, not only of the newsletters, but of their own existence. He is not able to understand that caring for the needs of others (whatever form that might take) and does not need an angle. I believe that every act of creation is like a newborn child, needing loving care and lots of attention, consuming your time and energy, and not necessarily profit-making. But if the urge is strong enough, you keep going. My voice teacher at college always said "you have to have blinkers on" when she felt there were too many distractions from the "straight and narrow". She was right. You have to literally blot out negative influences such as a question like that might engender. The German composer Max Reger once said about a rather negative newspaper review: "I have your remarks in front of me. Soon I shall have them behind me."

Faith Puleston, Germany fpuleston@gmx.net

+The key
"I've found that the greatest joys come from the confluence of brain, heart and hand." Here's a meaty, albeit abbreviated wealth of mature knowledge. Viktor Frankel: "Will to meaning, would applaud you, as I do, for this succinct enlightenment. Getting one's nose into the subject is the key to self-actualization in the grandest sense."

Zoe Hecht ParsifalsSister@aol.com

+TV tyranny
The very opposite to the "angle" philosophy is the television set. It is the worst destroyer of the human spirit, worse than any drug. It seems so innocent and attractive, yet it has everyone fooled.

Jim Rowe jim.rowe2@sympatico.ca

+Saskatchewan beauty
One of your readers commented on the flatness of Saskatchewan. Some of Canada's most beautiful scenery is in our province. My wife and I have a summer residence/painting retreat on the edge of the Qu'Appelle Valley, 8 miles north of Wolseley, which is 60 miles east of Regina on the Trans Canada Highway. Every day, winter or summer, presents stunning landscapes awaiting interpretation by the wide awake artist. I hope that travelers will take the time to meander a bit through this special part of a special country. There is a lot more than meets the eye.

Slater Tubman, Wolseley, Saskatchewan, Canada s.tubman@sk.sympatico.ca

+Tax question
I've been a self-supporting artist for the last 50 years. Just recently I became aware of your web site, And even more recently bought your book. You go into a fair amount of detail about Canadian taxes (on page 98). I get the impression that artists get a different deal than do other civilians. My wife and I plan on moving to Vancouver Island some time in the next year. Although I live in the United States, I am also a card carrying Canadian citizen. Is there a web site that you know of that could bring me up to speed regarding the tax situation up there? I hear horror stories about how high the taxes are in Canada and while I can't imagine it being much worse than here, a little knowledge wouldn't hurt me either.

Neil Boyle, Westlake Village, California, USA bswcaltd@earthlink.net

(RG note) The Canadian tax situation is about the same as in the USA, except it's a little more punitive. Having said that, artists with large cash flows in both countries can deduct or depreciate just about everything for the sake of the muse: cars, planes, motorhomes, travel, materials, assistants, studio space, shipping, etc. I recommend you talk to Bob McMurray. He's my accountant, he specializes in artists, and has cross-border clients. An article written by him about Canadian tax and artists is at: http://www.artists.ca/FCA-7c3.html

þ
Please feel free to comment on anyone's remarks. If you add your email address right after your name at the end of your letter, we will include it. If you wish to write incognito we will honor that too. All unused letters are carefully archived for possible future use. We generally include ten or so letters in each "clickback" so you can expect about the same amount of reading. Readers really appreciate it when you tell us approximately where you are located. We edit most letters for clarity and brevity. We are able to translate letters from most languages. Please address your letters to rgenn@saraphina.com

You may be interested to know that artists from every state in the USA, every province in Canada, and at least 80 countries worldwide have visited these pages since January 1, 2002. That includes Anne Gunderman, AnneGunderman@aol.com of Buffalo, NY, USA, who says, "Life is art!" and Norma Hopkins, norma@elizabethangold.co.uk of Bolton, Lancashire,UK, who says, " I too try to empower others who are searching for self-expression though creative embroidery."

(RG note) Some email addresses have been changed, bounced back, or have somehow been lost in the last while. The following artists are ones to whom we are currently not able to send the twice-weekly letter. If you know any of these artists please alert them as to the reason they are not receiving. They may wish to re-subscribe with their new addresses. Thanks. Rodrecas Davis; Tim Krause; Gerald Soworka; Victoria Culbertson; Morgan Larsson; Debra Jackson; Doris Quintana Cela; Susan Bruck; Will Naemur; Kent Wilkinson; Jack Whyte; Per Ola Juusola; Yiannos Ioannou; Zach Zachry; Damien Viadas; Troy Ackley; Denise Berkley; Kathy Robbins; Willa Harasym; Lee Scoggins; Carole Bake; Nathan Bellomy; Betty Millike; Meena Chopra; Anne Davis; Seataka; Buscio Communications; Allison Elliott; Spencer Kong; Linda Denis; Georgina Hedges; Kay Schroeder; Danielle Pare; Catherine Connoll; David Butt; Betty Whitney; Hellen Mantha; Shirley Kristensen; Mark Stosiak; Wayne Enslow; Mary Carter; Ray Christian; Cheryl Gilman.
They can re-subscribe at subscribe@saraphina.com

Selected responses to the previous letter, "New Year's Resolutions" are at
http://www.painterskeys.com/clickbacks/newyear.htm

The twice-weekly letters are in Russian at http://painterskeys.narod.ru/

The twice-weekly letters are in French at http://www.painterskeys.com/fr/

If you think a friend or fellow artist may find value in any of this please feel free to copy. This does not mean that they will automatically be subscribed to the twice-weekly letter. They have to do it voluntarily at subscribe@saraphina.com